That institution or the bank may sell as have no power, go to the bank directly or institution, contracted to buy a car specifications given, and concluded with the contract or to give them a deposit or so. This may not be a sale; because of this institution or the bank did not yet have the car how sell something is not owned by, and the Prophet peace be upon him has said: Do not sell what you do not have.
Then with this banned is that the institution or the bank is selling what does not have a fact like to be a twist on usury, a twist on a loan with interest, as though this man said to the institution or to the bank: lend me the value of this product with the benefit of a particular, lend me the value of this commodity interest , but instead of the exhibits this behavior say: lend me the usefulness of this sale came Graphic trick on the loan is forbidden.
If this picture say: It is haraam, and it means that unfortunately exist in some institutions and banks.
Second case: do not get signed earlier between the man and the institution or the bank to complete the procurement process, but it gets a promise of such an institution or the bank that they buy those goods which promises this man that he would buy them, so the question is based on the promise of a non-binding. Comes to them and say: "I want to buy me a car Modelha as well as kind as well as for color as well, and I promise you if you bought with buy it from you.
What is the difference between this image and the first picture? First in a contract entered into a contract with them, here's what the contract promised only. He noted that the promise is not binding. Says: I bought this product and I promise I will buy it from you. This image may be subject to two conditions:
The first condition: that the initial agreement between a promise and a promise to sell to buy. This promise is a promise binding means that each has of the institution or the bank and the man's option for each option in the completion of such sale or not completed.
Then with this banned is that the institution or the bank is selling what does not have a fact like to be a twist on usury, a twist on a loan with interest, as though this man said to the institution or to the bank: lend me the value of this product with the benefit of a particular, lend me the value of this commodity interest , but instead of the exhibits this behavior say: lend me the usefulness of this sale came Graphic trick on the loan is forbidden.
If this picture say: It is haraam, and it means that unfortunately exist in some institutions and banks.
Second case: do not get signed earlier between the man and the institution or the bank to complete the procurement process, but it gets a promise of such an institution or the bank that they buy those goods which promises this man that he would buy them, so the question is based on the promise of a non-binding. Comes to them and say: "I want to buy me a car Modelha as well as kind as well as for color as well, and I promise you if you bought with buy it from you.
What is the difference between this image and the first picture? First in a contract entered into a contract with them, here's what the contract promised only. He noted that the promise is not binding. Says: I bought this product and I promise I will buy it from you. This image may be subject to two conditions:
The first condition: that the initial agreement between a promise and a promise to sell to buy. This promise is a promise binding means that each has of the institution or the bank and the man's option for each option in the completion of such sale or not completed.
No comments:
Post a Comment